In order to aid your understanding, the underlined terms are hyperlinked to definitions in our online investment glossary.
Our market summary
February was characterised by a clear shift in investor sentiment. Markets moved away from large US technology stocks, particularly those linked to artificial intelligence (AI), and towards a broader mix of regions and sectors. While headlines were dominated by geopolitical developments and legal challenges to US trade policy, economic data was generally supportive. Meanwhile, inflation pressures continued to ease across major economies, helping investors feel more confident about the outlook for interest rates. Equity markets outside the US performed better, while government bonds delivered positive returns as investors adopted a more cautious stance. Overall, the month continued to highlight the importance of diversification, with market leadership broadening beyond a small group of high‑growth stocks.
US
In February, US equities returned 1.2% for sterling-based investors. However, this gain was due to the strength of the dollar vs sterling rather than market performance. In US dollar terms, US equities actually declined by 0.9% as investors reassessed valuations in large technology companies. Despite strong earnings results, concerns grew about whether heavy spending on AI will deliver sufficient long‑term returns. As a result, growth stocks lagged, while more defensive and value‑oriented sectors such as utilities, materials, and consumer staples held up better. US small caps performed relatively well, supported by improving domestic growth expectations and their lower exposure to mega‑cap technology names. Overall, investors favoured companies with more predictable earnings and cash flows.
Europe
European equities were up 4.9% in February, benefiting from improving economic data and a rotation away from US markets. Inflation continued to fall, reinforcing confidence that price pressures are under control and supporting expectations for a more stable interest‑rate environment. Energy and communication services stocks performed well, while healthcare and financials lagged. Elsewhere, business surveys pointed to gradually strengthening activity, particularly in manufacturing, and political uncertainty eased in France following agreement on the 2026 budget, which helped improve investor sentiment. Although technology stocks rose overall, software companies struggled as concerns grew about potential disruption from AI.
UK
UK equities performed strongly, up 6.6%, supported by the value‑focused sector mix of the UK market. Healthcare, utilities, telecommunications, and basic materials were among the best‑performing areas, with large pharmaceutical companies benefiting from solid earnings and corporate activity. Large‑cap stocks outperformed smaller, more domestically focused companies, reflecting ongoing caution around the UK growth outlook. Inflation slowed meaningfully during the month, increasing expectations that interest rate cuts may be approaching, even as economic growth forecasts were revised lower. Overall, the defensive characteristics of the UK, and exposure to income‑generating sectors, continued to appeal to investors seeking stability amid global uncertainty.
Japan
Japanese equities were one of the strongest‑performing markets in February ending the month up by 10.8%. A decisive election result strengthened expectations for political stability and continued pro‑growth policies, boosting investor confidence. Market leadership broadened, with cyclical sectors and companies linked to domestic demand performing well. Businesses involved in AI infrastructure, such as semiconductor and optical component manufacturers, also delivered strong gains. In contrast, some software and IT companies lagged due to concerns about disruption from generative AI. Overall, optimism around economic momentum, policy support, and improving corporate governance underpinned strong performance.
Emerging markets
Emerging markets were up 7.7% over the month, significantly outperforming developed markets. The gains were led by Asian markets, particularly Korea and Taiwan, where technology hardware and memory‑related stocks benefited from improving earnings expectations. Strength in precious metals supported markets such as South Africa, while political developments boosted confidence in Thailand. Elsewhere, performance was more mixed. Brazil lagged the broader emerging market index as economic data pointed to slowing growth, while China underperformed due to weakness in internet‑related stocks. India delivered positive returns but trailed the index, reflecting concerns over higher government borrowing.
Fixed income
Global government bonds were up 1.4% in February as investors became more cautious due to geopolitical risks, concerns about economic disruption from AI, and signs of labour market weakness in the US and UK. Falling inflation increased expectations of future interest rate cuts, particularly in the UK, where gilts performed strongly ending the month up 2.5%. US Treasury yields declined as markets priced in further policy easing later in the year. In contrast, corporate bond markets underperformed, with the gap between investment‑grade and high‑yield bond yields widening as investors demanded greater compensation for risk.
Source: Quilter as at 28 February 2026. Total return, percentage growth over period 31 January 2026 to 28 February 2026. Equities are represented by the appropriate MSCI index, the Magnificent Seven is represented by the Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF, UK gilts is represented by the ICE BofA UK Gilt Index, US Treasuries is represented by the ICE BofA US Treasury (GBP Hedged) Index, global government bonds is represented by the Bloomberg Global Aggregate Government - Treasuries (GBP Hedged) Index, and global corporate bonds is represented by the Bloomberg Global Aggregate - Corporate (GBP Hedged) Index.
Performance review
In February, the Monthly Income and Monthly Income and Growth portfolios delivered strong returns of 3.2% and 4.0%, respectively, with both portfolios ahead of their performance comparators.
All asset classes contributed positively, although it was the equity allocation that drove returns, particularly the UK and US regions. This was pleasing to see as the US market lagged its global peers but our value-tilted income generating exposures performed much better as the rotation out of tech and into old-economy stocks like energy and miners continued. The top performers were from Asia, as the Korean market was up 30% in just a month, helping these holdings deliver outsized contributions to portfolio returns despite not being very large weightings. In fixed income, government bonds outperformed corporate bonds as investors grew more confident about future interest rate cuts but became more worried about bond issuance required to fund artificial intelligence (AI) investment. Meanwhile, our alternatives holdings added to returns, most notably our infrastructure exposures.
The performance figures shown refer to past performance. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.
Performance summary
Portfolio activity
We sold out of the Montanaro UK Income Fund, putting two thirds of the proceeds into the Vanguard FTSE 250 ETF and the remainder into the JO Hambro UK Dynamic Fund. The market backdrop for Montanaro, as a UK small-cap quality growth manager, has been incredibly difficult over the past 18 months. While selling after a period of weak performance never feels good, we do not hold out high hopes for a resurgence of smaller companies in the UK or for the quality growth style to come back into vogue imminently. That said, there is clearly potential in UK market, so we are happy to maintain some smaller company exposure, albeit in reduced size. We believe a passive FTSE 250 exposure is better placed to benefit from a turn in sentiment, should it occur.
Investment outlook
We began 2026 after a few years of strong equity market returns and despite an eventful first two months of the year, markets are still riding high. AI is poised to drive transformational changes (and disruption) to businesses and economies, but the theme has broadened to encompass more than just mega-cap US tech companies. As the growth rate of AI capital expenditure slows (but remains very high) and the hyperscalers take on more debt, it will be interesting to see how investors digest this. Underperformance from corporate bonds in recent weeks suggests an underlying nervousness.
Is everyone in over their skis?
Consensus is for another good year. Equity markets already appear expensive but, in many cases, corporate profits justify these premium valuations. Clearly the risk of a pullback was elevated already, and the war unfolding in the Middle East has upended many investors’ forecasts. The economic impact of the war depends on how long it continues. The main way it would impact the global economy is via energy prices and disruption to shipping, which would restrain global growth. Energy importers in Europe and Asia are more exposed to this than the US. At this time, avoiding knee jerk and emotive reactions to headlines is key and it is important to remember that choosing to do nothing is a considered action in itself.
Has the inflation dragon been slain?
Inflation seems to be on its way down in the UK, paving the way for further rate cuts from the Bank of England amid weak domestic growth. In the US, the Supreme Court struck down Trump’s tariffs, but he quickly implemented new ones. Their impact in pushing prices higher now feels like last year’s news, but efficiency gains from AI presents downside risks to inflation. This backdrop should be good for bonds on both sides of the Atlantic, but it will be interesting to see how central banks react if energy prices rise persistently. It is not obvious that a rise in the oil price, which they cannot do anything about, should stop further interest rate cuts if growth slows, but the post-pandemic inflationary episode may make them more cautious.
Credit where credit is due
The additional yield for lending to companies compared to governments is close to historic lows. This reflects both the indebtedness of Western nations (pushing government bond yields higher) as well as strong company fundamentals (pushing corporate bond yields lower). So, despite the apparent ‘expensiveness’ of corporate bonds, we are happy to continue to own them. In particular, we see short duration high yield as an attractive income play with limited potential downside at a time when many other asset classes are expensive too.
Solutions
View the full range of multi-asset investment solutions offering a choice of outcomes at different risk and diversification levels.
Important Information
The value of investments can fall as well as rise. You might get back less than you invested.
This communication is issued by Quilter, a trading name of Quilter Investment Platform Limited
The Quilter Investors Monthly Income Portfolio and Quilter Investors Monthly Income and Growth Portfolio are sub-funds of Quilter Investors Multi-Asset OEIC, an investment company with variable capital incorporated in England and Wales. Quilter Investors Multi-Asset OEIC is authorised by the Financial Conduct Authority as a non-UCITS retail scheme and can be distributed to the public in the United Kingdom.
Approver: Quilter March 2026
QIP 238438/29/15609