Human rights is one of the three mega-themes which we focus our engagement activity around. As part of this we have committed through our stewardship process to engage with companies and funds to better understand or improve performance on issues such as decent work and pay, human rights in the supply chain, and health and safety as well as inclusion and diversity.
More specifically, where we have appropriate agency through our responsible investment processes, we commit to monitoring and respecting human rights included in the International Bill of Human Rights and International Labour Organization’s Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work and the eight core conventions.
Collaborative engagements
We join collaborative engagements where we can actively contribute and believe our engagement outcomes will be amplified. We target forums that align with our thematic priorities and where we have a material holding. We are active participants in a number of human rights collaborative engagement networks and view this as an important tool in identifying and preventing modern slavery within our investments.
Example:
While Quilter plc is an endorser of PRI Advance, Quilter Cheviot is also a participant in this collaborative engagement, having joined the working group as a co‑engager for a global mining company in 2025. As detailed above, the initiative aims to advance progress on human rights through investor stewardship. As part of this collaborative engagement as well as our participation in Nature Action 100, we regularly attend education sessions on global mining assurance standards and with local stakeholder groups. An example being an engagement with a local civil society organisation in Guinea who was documenting human rights concerns related to the operation of a large new mining project in the country. While this is not modern slavery specific, these interactions are an effective channel for hearing stakeholder grievances and informing future company engagement on all social issues. As part of the requirement of joining the PRI Advance collaboration we also added specific commitments to monitoring and respecting human rights included in the International Bill of Human Rights and International Labour Organization’s Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work and the eight core conventions.
Example:
In 2025, Quilter Cheviot renewed its support for the ‘Votes Against Slavery’ collaborative initiative, having begun supporting the project in 2021. The purpose is to engage with UK FTSE 350 and AIM companies that have not met reporting requirements under the 2015 Modern Slavery Act. In 2025 this initiative aims to promote compliance against the Modern Slavery Act for all listed UK companies, targeting 34 FTSE 350 and 66 AIM listed companies. Transparency is imperative in tackling modern slavery in supply chains and this engagement encourages the most influential companies to take action.
Quilter Cheviot participates in the Find it, Fix it, Prevent it collaborative engagement. The prohibition of slavery is one of the world’s most widely asserted practices. Regulation outlawing forced labour, human trafficking and slavery is to be found in international human rights law and in the legislation of many sovereign states. This collaborative engagement is focused on UK listed companies in specific industry groups which have been identified as being higher risk regarding modern slavery. Quilter Cheviot is a member of the working group engaging a construction company on modern slavery risk management and performance. Engagement with the company is ongoing and our participation in this engagement has improved our understanding of the risks in this sector.
Controversy engagements
As part of our ongoing monitoring and efforts to identify and eradicate instances of modern slavery in our investments and ensure appropriate remediation, we also engage on specific controversies.
Example:
As part of our multi-stage engagement regarding reports of child labour used in jasmine farms in Egypt, we spoke to the human rights and procurement specialists at L’Oréal to better understand its supply chain risk management and take a deeper dive into how the company is responding to the controversy. The level of access and detail given has provided us with additional comfort in assessing the company’s response to this event. We maintain our responsible investment categorisation, and based on our engagement to date, welcome L’Oréal’s coordinated action on this issue. Helping to launch and leverage a multi-stakeholder project like the one detailed above is a proactive approach to supplementing current monitoring practices, which are being further refined. In terms of next steps, we will monitor plan execution but assess remedial action to be well underway and there is no need for further escalation.
Voting policy
Within our voting policy we have explained how we approach social issues, the relevant extracts are below:
Human rights standards: We support the upholding of human rights global standards, including the UN Global Compact on Human Rights, which is focused on labour standards, environment, and business malpractice. More specifically, where we have appropriate agency through our responsible investment processes, we commit to monitoring and respecting human rights included in the International Bill of Human Rights and International Labour Organization’s Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work and the eight core conventions. We may vote against the report and accounts or individual director elections where concerns have been identified. We will also typically support shareholder proposals relating to transparency on company performance in relation to human rights standards at both an entity and supply chain level.
Modern Slavery Act reporting: We support the aims of the 2015 UK Modern Slavery Act and may vote against the report and accounts or individual director elections of companies that have not fulfilled reporting requirements. Shareholder resolutions: We will generally support shareholder resolutions for better company-level disclosure on diversity matters, where the ask is not considered overly prescriptive.
Social licence to operate: We may vote against the report and accounts or individual director elections where concerns related to stakeholder management, cultural heritage, or community issues have been identified.
Data and due diligence
This informs our engagement activity as well as how we assess the companies and funds we invest in from an environmental, social and governance perspective. We use multiple data providers which provide different information streams, for example one provider is focused on controversy reporting, whilst other monitor companies’ policies and actions.
Within our proprietary fund dashboards, we include factors related to modern slavery such as whether holdings have policies on forced labour, freedom of association, living wage, minimum wage as well as whistleblower protection. As part of our ongoing due diligence, we ask all funds within our centrally monitored holdings5 to complete an annual questionnaire, which currently includes a question around whether the manager has an engagement framework that incorporates human rights and modern slavery risks. We use the information captured in these questionnaires to inform our responsible investment fund engagements. We review and update our questionnaire annually and in 2026, we will look to incorporate additional questions around modern slavery factors to strengthen our due diligence and risk management.
For our equity holdings, modern slavery related factors will be included where they are identified as being material within the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (“SASB”) matrix. Our dashboards include a metric from the Corporate Human Rights Benchmark6 which ranks approximately 100 of the most influential companies operating in apparel, automotive manufacturing, extractives, food and agriculture, and ICT (electronic components, computers, communication equipment, and related technologies) manufacturing sectors. The metric is closely aligned with the UNGPs and OECD guidelines and incorporates policy commitments, board level accountability, human rights due diligence, and remedies and grievance mechanisms. We use our equity dashboards to inform our responsible investment categorisation process and regularly review the metrics in our dashboards to consider whether they remain appropriate.
Third-party managers
Within our Responsible Investment Policy, we have outlined our approach for third-party managers and PRI signatory status. From June 2021, we implemented a requirement that any new funds included in our portfolios must have UN PRI signatory status via their investment manager/adviser. If this is a fund managed by a recently established firm, we would agree a timeline for the firm to sign up to the UN backed PRI. In exceptional circumstances, new funds may be added to our investment universe which are not, and do not have an intention to become a signatory. However, this would be extremely rare and the rationale for not being a signatory would have to be linked explicitly to the specific strategy that the fund was invested in. Any fund being added to coverage in this instance would need to be agreed by the Chief Investment Officer.
For more information on our engagement activity, see the Quilter 2025 Stewardship Code Activities and Outcomes Report.