Skip to main content
Search

The limits of market wisdom

Date: 26 June 2026

4 minute read

Image of a person using laptop

Summary

This week’s blog is written by portfolio manager Ian Jensen-Humphreys

Financial markets are full of neat, memorable sayings. They are easy to repeat and often contain just enough truth to feel credible - appealing in an industry defined by uncertainty. The difficulty is that markets are rarely that simple. Many of these phrases are either taken out of context or strip away important nuance around valuation, time horizon, and behaviour. As a result, they can lead to conclusions that are incomplete or even misleading.

In this blog, I look at a few well-known investment sayings that don’t quite hold up and what we should consider instead.

Cash is King

This speaks to risk aversion – cash is the only asset that you can be sure won’t lose value. However, if your after-tax interest is lower than inflation, you are certainly eating away at your purchasing power. Furthermore, a long-term allocation to cash in an investment portfolio will almost certainly drag on returns. An oft-used rationale for a cash allocation is “I’m waiting for a better opportunity to enter the market” or “I’ll buy after a crash” – however timing the market is incredibly hard, and waiting for the bottom or the perfect entry point often means missing out of the largest market rebounds (particularly as the best time to invest in hindsight is often the scariest time in the moment).

Past performance is not a guide to future returns

This appears almost everywhere these days to protect retail investors from unscrupulous marketing that promises the earth. The problem with it is that it is just not always true. There is a host of academic literature that has explored and established the fact that investment assets exhibit trend-like behaviour i.e. if they have gone up, they are more likely to continue to go up, and vice versa. In fact, there is an established strategy within the investment management industry called “trend-following” which relies on this exact phenomenon to deliver strong risk adjusted returns. We even own one such fund in our portfolios.

This time it’s different

Also known as “the most dangerous words in finance” – this saying was originally used in relation to economic and banking crises but applies just as readily to commentary often heard frequently just before a market crash. Technically it might be true, as history almost never exactly repeats itself – however it often strongly rhymes. This is particularly true for investment bubbles, where investor over-confidence leads to price increases that far surpass rational or fundamental justification in a pattern that has been seen on many occasions.

Volatility is undesirable

Volatility is a four-letter word in finance – it is often used as a euphemism for falling asset values and is thus seen as something to avoid. However, in its strictest interpretation, volatility simply measures the extent to which prices move, both up and down. If you are a long term investor and you own a portfolio of assets that you are highly confident will deliver good returns in the long run, then more volatility can arguably be a good thing as it means higher ultimate profits (as long as you are prepared for a potentially rocky ride on the journey).

Nobody ever went bankrupt taking a profit

Strictly speaking this is correct, but it remains bad investment advice if you are trying to maximise your long-term returns. Investor psychology tends to lead to a desire to sell out of our winners (to book profits we can boast about) but to continue to hold our losers (to avoid crystalising losses). The problem with this is that on average, the winners keep on winning and the losers keep on losing – for example look at how few companies rise to dominate their field. So, all we are doing is magnifying losses and curtailing our gains – a strong recipe for underperformance. In an ideal world we want to maximise the profits from our good decisions and minimise the losses from our bad decisions, so we should be running our winners and cutting our losers.

These sayings are not always entirely wrong – but they are incomplete. Each contains some truth, yet overlooks the nuance required for good investment decisions. As discussed in previous blogs, markets are shaped as much by expectations and behaviour as by outcomes, making simple rules unreliable guides. In practice, successful investing requires patience, discipline, and a willingness to question easy narratives.

These phrases will no doubt persist – but investing is not a game of slogans. It is about managing risk, weighing probabilities, and thinking independently.

Ian Jensen-Humphreys

Portfolio Manager

Ian is a portfolio manager of the Quilter Investors Cirilium and Creation Portfolios. Ian joined Quilter Investors in March 2020 from Seven Investment Management (7IM), where he was deputy chief investment officer. Ian also spent 15 years at Goldman Sachs in risk management and portfolio hedging strategies.

Ian is a CFA charterholder and has a degree in Physics from the University of Oxford.