Skip to main content
Search

The importance of expectations

Date: 08 August 2025

4 minute read

Man using a phone and a laptop

This week’s blog is written by portfolio manager Ian Jensen-Humphreys

Despite a widely anticipated rate cut, markets reacted in unexpected ways following the Bank of England’s latest decision. In this latest portfolio manager blog, Ian Jensen-Humphreys explores why expectations matter more than outcomes, how investor sentiment can defy economic logic, and what this means for positioning in today’s market.

On Thursday 7 August, the Bank of England Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) voted to reduce the Bank of England base rate to 4.0%, down from 4.25%. Ordinarily, we might expect an interest rate reduction to lead to a fall in the value of the currency – as a Sterling depositor will now get less interest relative to deposits in other currencies. At the same time, we might expect government bonds to rally – lower interest rates should raise bond prices. But as of the time of writing this, the opposite occurred in both cases. Why was this?

What were the expectations going into the meeting?

One key aspect is the consensus expectations prior to the MPC meeting. There was a widespread consensus view that the base rate would fall to 4.0%, so at a high level, the outcome simply met those expectations. However, there is a little more nuance involved in this case. There are nine voting members on the MPC and each one tends to have persistent tendencies in the weight of importance they place on various economic data, and consequently how they tend to vote. Members who tend to tilt towards higher rates are referred to as “hawkish” (possibly due to a greater focus on high inflation data), whilst conversely members who tend to tilt towards lower rates are referred to as “dovish”.

The expectation for today was that two of nine members would vote for no change, five of nine would vote for a 0.25% base rate cut, and the remaining two members would vote for a larger 0.5% cut. In reality, we saw four members vote for no cut, and only one vote for a larger 0.5% cut. At the same time, the Bank of England released new inflation forecasts, with upward revisions for the expected inflation rate for the next few years. The market’s interpretation of this outcome is that, overall, the committee is less inclined to deliver future cuts than had been previously assumed, which is a “hawkish” outcome versus those prior expectations. Hence the rally in Sterling and the sell-off in gilts as expectations of future interest rate levels are revised higher.

Why does this matter?

It is important to consider that asset prices don’t move simply because of events, they move because of buy and sell decisions made by investors, often, but not always, resulting from those events. Therefore, we need to have a view not just on what might happen to companies or economies, but crucially we need to understand what everyone else is thinking and doing. In a way, it is not too dissimilar to poker, where your strategy will be based, not just on your own cards, but also on what cards you think other players might have and how they might behave.

A good example of this relates to popular stocks. A company might deliver really strong earnings, but if active managers hold an overweight position, then there might be limited scope for them to buy more shares, and as a result there might not be much incremental buying demand, despite the good results. Alternatively, the results might be good, but not quite as good as investors had hoped for, which could lead to profit taking if they cause future expectations to be revised lower. Being right about the outcome may not be sufficient to generate good returns.

Being different from the crowd

We spend a lot of time trying to think about where our forecasts and expectations might be different from the market consensus – as that is typically where we can make profits. For example, we might reduce equities if we think that expectations for future earnings growth are so high, such that even if they turn out to be reasonably good, then this would be a disappointment on average to the market. The same would apply to market valuations – just because something is cheap today, doesn’t mean it can’t become cheaper in the future. This means that understanding the consensus view, and how we differ from it, is a key part of our role.

Portfolio manager blog - this week written by

Ian Jensen-Humphreys

Portfolio Manager

Ian is a portfolio manager of the Quilter Investors Cirilium and Creation Portfolios. Ian joined Quilter Investors in March 2020 from Seven Investment Management (7IM), where he was deputy chief investment officer. Ian also spent 15 years at Goldman Sachs in risk management and portfolio hedging strategies.

Ian is a CFA charterholder and has a degree in Physics from the University of Oxford.

Last week's portfolio manager blog

Global equity markets: all time high

Despite rising tariffs and ongoing political uncertainty, global equity markets remain near record levels. In his latest portfolio manager blog, CJ Cowan explores why markets are holding up so well, what’s driving investor optimism, and whether this resilience is built on solid ground - or something more fragile.

Read the previous blog