Skip to main content
Search

Human nature

Date: 13 February 2026

4 minute read

Autumn Budget 2025

One of the under appreciated aspects of my role is the opportunity to meet and speak with external fund managers. Gaining insight into how different people believe they can make money across styles, asset classes and sectors is interesting not only from the perspective of identifying which managers we should select for our clients, but also at a slightly more conceptual level.

It's great to be able to read a shiny marketing deck but generally, the more important question is whether managers truly understand: what they are actually doing (in the abstract), why their approach works, and why it might be repeatable. In short, what is their edge?

Broadly speaking, I tend to think about investment “edge” in one of three categories.

The first is informational edge: having access to better information than others. Historically this may have included sketchy practices that we would now recognise as insider dealing. But today this can come about by having on-the-ground presence to access specific corporate filings, being able to conduct channel checks, or the ability to access alternative data sources that give a quicker read on new product uptake.

The second is analytical edge: the ability to process and interpret data more effectively than peers. This might come from well resourced technology platforms, innovative quantitative techniques, or specialist expertise such as forensic accounting.

The third is behavioural edge, which is often under appreciated. Given the analysis you have conducted, what do you actually do with it? Trading skill and decision making matter, and those with high levels of edge here tend to maximise the value of their decisions - rather than necessarily always trying to be correct. (A former colleague, Lee Freeman Shor, has written extensively on this topic).

Consider a value manager focused on turnaround situations. In general, they will be looking for companies which are displaying improvements in operating metrics, that are unappreciated by the market, but that will eventually unlock higher share prices. If these companies are also trading on low valuations, there may be additional upside from re‑rating. However, these opportunities often work very quickly, and so a good manager will know that well considered execution of their idea is the best way to generate alpha.

Equally important is ensuring where a manager knows where they should not be active. In this same example, alarm bells would ring if the same value manager began buying supposedly “under‑appreciated turnaround” growth stocks in what we would recognise as “beat the fade” companies, which tend to make their money in a much slower way than this manager would usually make money.

 

 

Man in the mirror

But as investors (as well as allocators), it would be a little presumptuous to go through this level of research without a degree of self‑reflection. We should be clear about where we can reasonably expect to generate positive returns through our own actions.

We do not believe we have a meaningful informational edge. However, we do think we have strengths in both analytical and behavioural aspects of investing. For example, we try to be disciplined about when and where we take tactical views, and equally disciplined about recognising where we have no genuine insight.

A recent example was the Japanese election held the first weekend of February. While markets were clearly pricing in a positive outcome (i.e. a substantial win for new PM Takaichi), we had limited insight into the likely result. Our view was that an adverse outcome would probably have produced a more negative market reaction than the relatively benign response that followed the actual result. We chose to reduce risk into the event by trimming our overweight position.

Looking ahead through the rest of 2026, there are several significant events on the horizon, including local elections in the UK in May, and the US mid‑term elections in November. We do not believe we have an edge in predicting these outcomes. As a result, our focus will be on risk management around these events and on taking advantage of any resulting dislocations, rather than positioning portfolios around a specific political view.

Ultimately, the concept of “edge” is central to successful investing, but it is also one that is easy to claim and hard to demonstrate. For advisers, understanding where managers genuinely add value - and where they do not - is crucial when constructing robust portfolios for clients. Equally, being honest about our own strengths and limitations helps avoid taking uncompensated risks. In a world dominated by uncertainty and noise, clarity about edge, discipline in behaviour, and humility about what we cannot know, remain some of the most reliable tools available.

 

 

Key takeaways

  • Know your edge: Investment “edge” tends to come from information, analysis or behaviour - and understanding which applies is essential for both managers and allocators.
  • Discipline matters: Strong analytical and behavioural discipline - knowing when to act and when not to – can help avoid uncompensated risks, especially around unpredictable events.
  • Clarity beats noise: In a world full of uncertainty, being honest about strengths, limitations and decision‑making frameworks is one of the most reliable ways to deliver consistent long‑term value.

Sacha Chorley

Portfolio Manager

Sacha is a portfolio manager of the Quilter Investors Cirilium and Creation Portfolios. Prior to joining Quilter Investors in 2011, Sacha worked at Broadstone with their team of economists before moving into asset allocation and fund manager research.

Sacha is a CFA charterholder and has also completed the Chartered Alternative Investment Analyst qualification. Sacha has a degree in Maths from the University of Bath.